Dr. Martin Dukerat, a medical journalist known for his work on “Cotidian Medicine,” recently experimented with Chat GP 4. He cautioned that not all information provided by robots is accurate, emphasizing the necessity of a healthcare professional’s opinion. Nonetheless, he also acknowledged that Artificial Intelligence (AI) is already providing significant assistance in various medical fields.
During a crucial conference on Artificial Intelligence in Paris on February 6th, Dr. Martin Dukerat expressed his belief that the role of AI in daily life is increasing. He highlighted the growing use of chatbots in activities like purchasing cars, banking services, and coaching in sports. However, when it comes to healthcare, he warned against relying on Chat GP 4 at the moment.
Dr. Martin conducted the experiment with Chat GP 4 from the perspective of a patient. In one test, when he had a knee injury and was unable to walk, Chat GP 4 provided some general advice that proved to be quite accurate, such as using bandages, keeping the leg elevated, applying ice, and taking paracetamol for pain relief. However, in another test, when he inquired about anti-inflammatory drugs for a sore throat, Chat GP 4’s response highlighted several shortcomings.
He further explained that online conversational systems for health information, like Chat GP 4 and Deep Seek, are limited for the general public and are not suitable for medical purposes. Professor Jean-Emmanuel Bebeau, an expert in cancer research, confirmed that current robotic conversational systems are not ready for medical purposes. However, he also suggested that in the future, more advanced models could be more effective in certain medical tasks compared to professional individuals.
Nevertheless, Dr. Martin stressed that artificial intelligence will not replace doctors but rather assist them. He emphasized the primary goal of improving patient care and suggested that if AI proves to be helpful in this regard, it should be utilized for the benefit of patients.
